"Destroy This Temple" - The Messianic Promise of Rebuilding in John 2:18-19
Rebuilding the Temple of the LORD 1
In John 2:18–19, following Jesus’ bold action of cleansing the Temple, the Jewish leaders demand a sign: “What sign can you give us to prove your authority?” Jesus responds with a cryptic but powerful statement:
“Destroy this Temple, and I will raise it up in three days.”
John then adds that Jesus was speaking of his body—not the physical Temple in Jerusalem.
To modern ears, this may sound like a metaphor. But in the context of Second Temple Judaism, Jesus’ statement echoes a deep and widely held expectation: that the Messiah would rebuild the Temple and reestablish God’s presence among his people.
This idea, woven throughout Jewish texts such as the Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Dead Sea Scrolls, Targums, and even Philo's writings, lends weight to Jesus’ words and strongly hints at his messianic identity.
During the intertestamental period, the Temple in Jerusalem stood as a diminished version of the glorious structure Solomon had once built. Many Jews longed for a return to that former splendor, associating it with the presence and favor of God.
According to the Jewish historian Josephus, Herod the Great undertook an ambitious project to rebuild and expand the Temple and its surrounding sanctuary beginning around 20–19 BC.
Josephus writes in The Antiquities of the Jews, Book 15, Chapter 11:
And now Herod, in the eighteenth year of his reign, and after the acts already mentioned, undertook a very great work, that is, to build of himself the temple of God, and make it larger in compass, and to raise it to a most magnificent altitude, as esteeming it to be the most glorious of all his actions, as it really was, to bring it to perfection, and that this would be sufficient for an everlasting memorial of him 2
While the main structure was completed in roughly a decade, the beautification and expansion of the Temple complex continued well into the first century AD—during Jesus's lifetime.
This ongoing construction project explains the response of the Jewish leaders in John 2:20: “It has taken forty-six years to build this Temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?” Their remark reflects not only the grandeur of Herod’s Temple but also the deeply rooted Jewish hopes tied to the restoration of God’s dwelling place on earth.
1. Tobit and the Hope of a Restored Tabernacle
The Apocryphal book of Tobit—popular among first-century Jews and still canonical in Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions—envisions a future restoration of Jerusalem.
In Tobit 13:10, we read:
"Acknowledge the Lord, for he is good, and bless the King of the ages, so that his Tabernacle will be rebuilt in you in joy."
Here, and elsewhere, the Tabernacle represents the divine dwelling place—the visible sign of God’s presence. The longing for its restoration is deeply intertwined with the hope of redemption, national restoration, and divine mercy.
2. Pseudepigrapha: The Sanctuary of God and the Coming Age
The Book of Jubilees is a Jewish pseudepigraphal work composed sometime between the late 2nd century BCE and early 1st century BCE. Most scholars believe it originated within a priestly or sectarian community, possibly aligned with the Essenes.
The book offers a rewritten account of the narratives found in Genesis and parts of Exodus, structured around a chronological framework of "jubilee" periods (49-year cycles). It expands upon the biblical text by adding interpretive commentary, legendary traditions, and detailed laws, reflecting the concerns and worldview of its authors.
The text emphasizes strict observance of purity laws, Sabbath-keeping, and covenantal faithfulness, offering a window into the evolving theological and legal landscape of Second Temple Judaism.
In the Book of Jubilees (1:17-18) 3, God promises,
"I will build my sanctuary in their midst and live with them. I will be their God, and they will be my people in truth and righteousness. I will not abandon them, because I am the Lord their God."
This sanctuary is more than stone and mortar—it is the symbol of divine permanence and faithfulness.
The Testament of Benjamin (9:2), written around 200 BC, connects this sanctuary with a coming prophetic figure:
“But in your allotted place will be the temple of God, and the latter temple will exceed the former in glory. The twelve tribes shall be gathered there and all the nations, until such time as the Most High shall send forth his salvation through the ministration of the unique prophet.” 4
This prophet, a messianic figure, would preside over a temple more glorious than Solomon’s—a clear precursor to Jesus’ identity claim.
3. The Dead Sea Scrolls: A Temple of Glory and the Branch of David
The Essenes were a sect of priests who withdrew from the Jerusalem Temple establishment in protest against what they perceived as deep corruption within the priesthood. Disillusioned by the leadership in Jerusalem, they separated themselves into desert communities—most notably at Qumran—where they devoted themselves to purity, study, and preparation for the coming age.
Like the early followers of Jesus, who came to be known as The Way, the Essenes viewed themselves as the faithful remnant of Israel. In addition to preserving the Hebrew Scriptures, they produced writings that outlined their beliefs, practices, and apocalyptic expectations.
Central to their hope was the restoration of God’s glory, the purification of the Temple, and the return of Jerusalem as the heart of God's kingdom on earth.
At Qumran, the Essenes preserved texts that pointed to a future Temple and a messianic figure drawn from 2 Samuel 7.
One text [4QFlorilegium] reads:
“YHVH declares to you that he will build you a house. I will raise up your seed after you and establish the throne of his kingdom 11 [forever]. I will be a father to him, and he will be a son to me. This (refers to the) branch of David, who will arise with the Interpreter of the law who [will rise up] in Zi[on in] the last days. 5
and again the Temple Scroll [11QTemple XXIX],
"They shall for me be a people, and I will be for them forever, and I shall establish them forever and always. I shall sanctify my temple with my glory, for I shall make my glory reside over it until the day of creation, when I shall create my temple, establishing it for myself forever, in accordance with the covenant which I made with Jacob at Bethel." 6
These texts combine Temple, divine glory, and messianic expectation—all core elements in Jesus’ statement in John 2.
4. Philo of Alexandria and the ‘Rising Man’
Philo of Alexandria—a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher and contemporary of Jesus—also comments on Zechariah 6:12. Writing in Greek from Egypt, Philo blended Jewish theology with Greek philosophy, and his influence is especially evident in the Gospel of John’s themes of Logos and divine embodiment.
In interpreting Zechariah’s “man whose name is the Branch,” Philo hears something even more profound. He writes:
“I have heard also an oracle from the lips of one of the disciples of Moses, which runs thus: ‘Behold a man whose name is the rising’ (Zech. 6:12), strangest of titles, surely, if you suppose that a being composed of soul and body is here described.
But if you suppose that it is that Incorporeal one, who differs not a whit from the divine image, you will agree that the name of ‘rising’ assigned to him quite truly describes him.
For that man is the eldest son, whom the Father of all raised up, and elsewhere calls him His first-born, and indeed the Son thus begotten followed the ways of his Father, and shaped the different kinds, looking to the archetypal patterns which that Father supplied.” (On the Confusion of Tongues, §62–63) 8
Philo’s “Rising Man” is not merely a human being but an incorporeal Son, the divine archetype— the firstborn—who reflects God's image and serves as the cosmic blueprint for creation. This aligns closely with John’s presentation of Jesus as the Logos made flesh (John 1:14) and Paul’s language about the heavenly man (1 Cor. 15:47).
Philo’s interpretation of Zechariah 6:12 shows how deeply this passage influenced first-century Jewish thinking. For those shaped by both Jewish and Hellenistic worldviews, this “Branch” or “Rising” figure was already understood in transcendent, even divine terms. John’s Gospel taps into this very stream—presenting Jesus not only as the Messiah but as the embodied divine Son who fulfills these ancient hopes.
5. Targums and the Messianic Builder
Perhaps the clearest connection to Jesus’ declaration comes from the Aramaic Targum on Zechariah 6:12–13. The Hebrew reads:
“Behold, a man called the Branch (lit. ‘rising’)... he shall build the Temple of the LORD... he shall be a priest on his throne.”
But the Targum, a version more accessible to Aramaic-speaking Jews of the first century, interprets this passage as:
“Thus speaks the LORD of hosts, saying, behold, the man whose name is the Anointed [Messiah] will be revealed and he shall be raised up and shall build the Temple of the LORD.” 9
This targumic interpretation shows how first-century Jews would have heard the connection: the Messiah builds the Temple. For John and early Christians steeped in this tradition, Jesus was that Messiah—and his resurrected(raised up) body was the true Temple.
6. A New Kind of Temple
But Jesus redefines the Temple—not as a physical structure but as a living, divine reality. The Temple he will raise in three days is his resurrected body, the true dwelling place of God’s glory.
This concept expands in the New Testament. 1 Peter 2:4–5 says:
"You also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house... to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ."
Here, the community of believers becomes the new Temple—animated by the Spirit, built on the foundation of Christ, and embodying the presence of God.
In this light, Jesus’ cryptic response in John 2:19 was far more than a clever metaphor. It was a bold messianic claim rooted in a deep river of Jewish hope: that the Messiah would rebuild the Temple. The twist, as John makes clear, is that this Temple is not made with human hands, but by the power of resurrection—and its stones are the lives of those who follow the risen Christ.
References - Fig Tree Ministries participates in the Amazon marketing program and may receive portion of the proceeds directly from Amazon.
1. Koester, Craig R. (2003). Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel: Meaning, Mystery, Community (2nd ed.). Fortress: Minneapolis, (pg. 87)
2. Flavius Josephus and William Whiston, The Works of Josephus: Complete and Unabridged (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1987), 423.
Klawans, J. and Wills, L.M. (2020). The Jewish Annotated Apocrypha. Oxford University Press, pg. 7. (https://amzn.to/4k0Uvxp).
4 Charlesworth, James H. (2010). The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Hendrickson Publishers.
5 Martinez, Garcia (1994). The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English. Brill, pg. 136.
6 Martinez, Garcia (1994). The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English. Brill, pg. 162
7 Philo, Philo, trans. F. H. Colson, G. H. Whitaker, and J. W. Earp, vol. 4, The Loeb Classical Library (London; England; Cambridge, MA: William Heinemann Ltd; Harvard University Press, 1929–1962), 45.
8 Berlin, Adele and Brettler, Marc Zvi (2014). The Jewish Study Bible, 2nd ed. Oxford. pg. 1243
Comments